Verification: is it the same as the source?
Verification checks that data has been copied or typed accurately from the source document. The source is the original, such as a paper form.
There are two methods. Visual verification: a person compares the entered data with the source by eye. Double data entry: the data is typed twice, and the computer compares the two versions.
If the two versions differ, the computer flags the item so a person can check it.
e.g.ExampleDouble data entry of a phone number:
First entry: 612 345 678
Second entry: 612 354 678
The computer finds a mismatch, so the operator checks the paper form and corrects it.
?Why?Validation cannot know what the source said. Only comparing with the source, by eye or by a second typing, can catch a sensible but wrong value.
!Watch outDouble data entry does not mean typing it twice and seeing if it "looks right". The computer compares the two entries character by character.
Errors to look for in a visual check
Transposition: two characters swapped, such as 1945 typed as 1954, or "form" for "from".
Spelling: a letter missing, added or wrong.
Consistent spacing: one space between words, the same gap after every full stop.
Consistent case: capital letters exactly as in the source, such as "Madrid" not "madrid".
e.g.ExampleSource: Order 4521, Calle de Alcalá 28, MADRID
Typed: Order 4512, Calle de alcalá 28, MADRID
Errors: 4521 → 4512 (transposition), alcalá (case), two spaces before MADRID (spacing).
?Why?These are exactly the slips a spell check and validation both miss. A careful eye finds them.
Try it: verify or validate?
Use the toy. In part 1, fix the second entry so the double entry check passes. In part 2, tap each field on screen that is different from the paper form.
In part 3, type marks and see the range check. Notice which errors each method catches.
Look for a value that passes validation but is still wrong, such as 76 typed for 67.
?Why?Seeing a wrong but sensible value pass validation is the best way to remember why both checks are needed.
There is something to try for this step in the IGCSE library.
Validation vs verification
Validation asks: is this data reasonable? It is done by the computer, using rules.
Verification asks: is this data the same as the source? It compares with the original.
A system uses both. Neither one proves the data is true. A form filled in wrongly by the customer passes both.
!Watch outSaying "validation checks the data is correct" loses the mark. Use the word sensible or reasonable for validation and accurately copied for verification.
Proofread the layout
Open print preview and check every page.
Consistent line spacing and paragraph spacing throughout. No blank pages, often caused by extra Enters or a stray page break at the end.
No widows or orphans. A widow is the last line of a paragraph alone at the top of a page. An orphan is the first line of a paragraph alone at the bottom of a page.
Tables and lists not split across pages, unless they are too long to fit on one page.
?Why?Widows, orphans and split tables break the reader's flow and look careless. Cambridge mark schemes give a mark for a layout free of them.
!Watch outTurn on widow and orphan control in the paragraph settings. Use keep with next for a heading, so it never sits alone at the bottom of a page above its text.
A proofing routine for the practical exam
1. Run spell check with English (UK). Judge each suggestion. Keep names from the source.
2. Compare every piece of text you typed with the question paper, word by word.
3. Turn on formatting marks. Look for double spaces and extra blank lines.
4. Print preview every page: spacing, blank pages, widows and orphans, split tables, header and footer on every page.
!Watch outHow candidates lose marks: accepting a wrong spell-check suggestion for a name; a transposed number in a table; a blank last page; a heading stranded at the bottom of a page; a table or bulleted list split over two pages; extra blank lines between some paragraphs only.